<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frosty Goodness &#187; Bridgeport Brewing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frostygoodness.com/category/bridgeport/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frostygoodness.com</link>
	<description>Rarely updated. Poorly written. On the subject of beer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:26:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bridgeport Stumptown Tart 2011. How a sequel kills a franchise.</title>
		<link>http://frostygoodness.com/bridgeport-stumptown-tart-2011-how-a-sequel-kills-a-franchise/</link>
		<comments>http://frostygoodness.com/bridgeport-stumptown-tart-2011-how-a-sequel-kills-a-franchise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 05:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frosty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1/6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bridgeport Brewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frostygoodness.com/?p=1244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I was sipping some fun and different flavors at the recent Portland Fruit Beer Festival, it struck me suddenly that there was a particular entry that seemed to be glaringly absent. You see, Bridgeport recently released this years edition of Stumptown Tart. Yet despite the brewery being only a few miles away, and ST [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I was sipping some fun and different flavors at the recent Portland Fruit Beer Festival, it struck me suddenly that there was a particular entry that seemed to be glaringly absent. You see, Bridgeport recently released this years edition of Stumptown Tart. Yet despite the brewery being only a few miles away, and ST being a fruit beer and all, it seemed a curious omission. And it got me to thinking. I sure haven&#8217;t heard much about it in the social media world. None of the local beer bloggers had talked about it. And they didn&#8217;t even send me one (I know, right?). All of which led me to the conclusion&#8230;the brewery doesn&#8217;t like it. I mean, really&#8230;almost no marketing push, no inclusion in the local FRUIT beer fest. So I set about to try and find some to test it myself.</p>
<p>And try I had to. Apart from Belmont Station and presumably the brewery itself, I couldn&#8217;t find it anywhere. So after a trip to the previously mentioned Belmont, I returned home and did the most regretable thing I could have. I tasted it.</p>
<p>Ugh. I didn&#8217;t want to be right about my suspicions, but I played a perfect Sherlock on this one. In what has been a steady decline in greatness since then first Stumptown Tart, this year&#8217;s (and I&#8217;ll bet final) rendition is just not good. Not at all. Not even a little. It&#8217;s just &#8230;.blech. Barely fruity, barely decent ale flavor. For the first time in four years, I poured a Stumptown Tart down the sink. You can blame the strawberry inclusion if you want (there are almost no decent strawberry beers), but I think it&#8217;s just a case of it being time to put the idea out to pasture. ST One was amazing. But like so many ham fisted attempts at cashing in on sequels (cough&#8230;Matrix&#8230;cough&#8230;Star Wars), this beer was phoned in, and it&#8217;ll take many more bottles of something good before the travesty is wiped from my memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frostygoodness.com/bridgeport-stumptown-tart-2011-how-a-sequel-kills-a-franchise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

